Unbiased Analysis of Today's Healthcare Issues
A paper by Westrich et al. (2023) examines payer perceptions of five different value frameworks. Value frameworks of interest included: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Value Framework, Drug Pricing Lab’s Drug Abacus (formerly Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center’s Drug Abacus), Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) value assessment framework and evidence reports The…
Health Care Payment Learning and Action Network (HCP LAN) is dedicated to moving the health care system from volume-based, fee-for-service reimbursement, to alternative payment models (APM). While there are a large number of different types of APMs, broadly, all of them shift more financial risk to providers while also linking reimbursement to quality of care.…
CMS is increasingly moving to alternative payment models whereby providers are paid based on their ability to improve/maintain quality and hold the line on cost. A key question then, is how does CMS evaluate quality of care? Today, the Healthcare Economist will answer this question for the case of Medicare’s Shared Savings Program (MSSP), which…
AJMC reports that Humana has designed a new bundled payment model for maternity care. Initially, 5 practices will participate in a pilot study. While some claimed that bundled payment will improve quality and reduce cost (see “Bundle of Joy“), do we expect this to happen in practice? The key question is, what one means in…
That is the question that Carroll and co-authors try to answer in their latest NBER working paper (WP #23926). They examine the Arkansas Health Care Payment Improvement Initiative (APII), which is a state-wide, multi-payer episode-based program. Unlike most episode-based payment (EBP) models, provider participation in the program was mandatory (as of 2013). NBER summarizes the program…
The answer is maybe. Value-based insurance design ties patient cost sharing to the notion of a treatment’s value. Higher value treatments have lower cost sharing; lower value treatments have higher cost sharing. The Incidental Economist writes: In his own practice, Dr. Fendrick feels as if standard insurance is working against him and his patients. “They are deeply…
Value frameworks are all the rage of late. But are payers really using them? According to my colleague Jeremy Schafer, the answer is yes. From an article in Drug Topics: “Value assessment may become more important as the health-care market shifts to outcomes and value-based reimbursement models,” said Jeremy Schafer, PharmD, MBA, Senior Vice President…
Are high deductible health plans a good thing? Republicans typically argue yes as they say that increased cost sharing reduces moral hazard. That is, when people have to pay for medical care out of pocket, they don’t ask for unnecessary care or use care more frugally. Democrats typically argue that increased cost sharing reduces demand…
Maybe not. That is the answer from a study by Thompson et al. (2016). Using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Databases (SID) for six states (AR, FL, IA, MA, NY,WA) from 2011 to 2013, the authors measure hospital performance reliability for the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP). The define reliability as follows:…
In a typical insurance plan, patients have a fixed copayment, insurance and deductible regardless of whether the treatment they receive is considered high or low value. However, an alternative insurance structure–known as value-based insurance design (VBID)–uses a different approach. Under VBID, patient cost sharing is higher for low-value treatments and lower or eliminated for high-value…